Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-04-11 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2008-04-11 House Journal Page 2852 HB 166 Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 2787) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 166(FIN) "An Act relating to contributions from permanent fund dividends to community foundations, to certain educational organizations, and to certain other charitable organizations; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 166(FIN) am S "An Act relating to contributions from permanent fund dividends to community foundations, to certain educational organizations, and to certain other charitable organizations; relating to the execution upon permanent fund dividends; amending Rule 89, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." (SCR 29 - title change resolution) There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2008-04-11 House Journal Page 2853 Representative Samuels moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 166(FIN), thus adopting SCS CSHB 166(FIN) am S, and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 166(FIN)?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 166(FIN) am S Concur YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Nelson, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Guttenberg And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 166(FIN) am S. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 166(FIN) am S was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.